AI Money Hub

●EDITORIAL STANDARDS

How we work.

No mystery. Here's how a review gets from "we should cover X" to a published article on this site, and what you can hold us to.

Who runs this

AI Money Hub is published by Joy Jacob through dhumketu ai labs, an independent publisher in Ahmedabad, India. Joy is an automation engineer (Product Owner at Oizom; 5+ years building production n8n + firmware systems). One person, one editor, no investors, no marketing department.

What we cover (and what we don't)

We focus on tools and topics close to what we actually use: AI writing and image tools, coding assistants, automation platforms, web hosting, and the SEO + content workflow around them. If we don't have a credible angle on a category, we don't pretend to — we won't publish "best CRM software 2026" because that's not our world.

How we use AI

We use AI to assist research and drafting. The pipeline looks roughly like this:

  1. Topic selection — picked by Joy based on what's actually being asked about, what we use ourselves, or where the existing coverage online is weak or outdated.
  2. Research — AI gathers current pricing, feature lists, and recent reviews from the web. Joy reviews and corrects what AI gets wrong (it gets things wrong).
  3. Draft — AI writes a structured first draft from the research.
  4. Editorial pass — Joy edits for accuracy, removes hallucinated claims, replaces vague filler with specifics, and adds context from real use where applicable.
  5. Publish — the article is committed to our git repo, the build pipeline applies the design system, and Cloudflare Pages deploys it.

Google's helpful-content guidelines don't penalise AI-assisted content; they penalise AI-generated content with no human oversight or expertise. We sit firmly on the "assisted" side of that line, and we'd rather tell you that than hide it.

What "verdict" means

When a review picks one tool over another, the verdict reflects: (a) what the tool actually does versus what its marketing says, (b) value-per-dollar for the use case the article is about, (c) honest tradeoffs we'd tell a friend in person. We don't pick winners by who pays the highest affiliate commission.

If we haven't personally used a tool extensively, the article says "based on documentation and user reports" rather than implying first-hand testing we didn't do.

Sources and citations

Where we cite specific data — pricing tiers, feature lists, performance numbers — we link to the source (the vendor's own pricing page, a public benchmark, or a credible third-party review). If we say a tool costs $X, that figure was current as of the article's last revision date. Pricing changes; we update articles when we notice or get told.

Updates and corrections

If you spot something wrong — outdated pricing, broken link, factual error, anything — email [email protected] with the URL and what's wrong. We update fast on factual issues. The "Updated" date at the top of each article is the last time the article was substantively touched.

Affiliate policy

Some links in our reviews are affiliate links. If you buy through one, we may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. Three rules we hold ourselves to:

  1. The verdict comes first, the affiliate program second. If a tool we like doesn't have an affiliate program, we still recommend it. If a tool with a generous affiliate program isn't good, we won't recommend it. We've turned down both.
  2. If a tool gets worse, we say so. Articles get re-reviewed. A tool that drops out of our recommendation also loses its affiliate placement.
  3. No paid placement disguised as editorial. If a piece is sponsored, it's clearly labelled. We currently accept no paid placement at all.

Advertising

This site is funded by Google AdSense and affiliate commissions. We don't choose which AdSense ads appear — Google's auto-placement does. Ads are not endorsements. If an ad is broken, misleading, or shouldn't be on the site, email us with a screenshot.

Privacy and data

How we handle visitor data is documented on our privacy page. Short version: we collect the minimum needed to operate the site and serve advertising; everything beyond that is handled by Google + Cloudflare under their published policies.

Editorial independence

Joy is the sole editor and has final say on every article. Tool vendors do not see articles before publication, do not get pre-approval rights, and cannot pay to change a verdict. If a vendor offers free product access for review purposes, we accept it and disclose it; that doesn't change the verdict either.

If you have a complaint

Email [email protected]. Substantive feedback gets a response within seven days. Bulk outreach, "we'd love to be featured" pitches with no genuine fit, and link-trade requests do not.

Last updated: 8 May 2026.